On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, senthil wrote:
> The constant value was smaller than the working set size according
> to polymix-4 default calculations based on request rate,fillable
> ratio,host count,etc. There wasnt any other change between the two
> tests other than this.
I cannot explain higher hit response time then. If these results are
reproduceable, I am sure one can find out exactly what is going on by
carefully comparing detailed Polygraph reports and perhaps
cache-reported stats. 15 second response time is huge and there must
be some explanation for that.
Also, Polygraph reports actual working set sizes in console (--console
option) logs; you may want to check that your intent to have a smaller
working set size matches what Polygraph used/logged during these two
tests.
Alex.
-- Protocol performance, functionality, and reliability testing. Tools, services, and know-how. http://www.measurement-factory.com/Received on Fri Jun 18 2004 - 10:40:17 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 12:00:08 MST