why low hit rate in squid compare to others?

From: A. O. Salam-Alada (alada@ccse.kfupm.edu.sa)
Date: Thu Aug 28 2003 - 13:17:37 MDT

Next message: Alex Rousskov: "Re: why low hit rate in squid compare to others?"
Previous message: Alex Rousskov: "Re: need your help: unable to compile polygraph-2.7.6 on redhat 9.0"
In reply to: Alex Rousskov: "Re: need your help: unable to compile polygraph-2.7.6 on redhat 9.0"
Next in thread: Alex Rousskov: "Re: why low hit rate in squid compare to others?"
Reply: Alex Rousskov: "Re: why low hit rate in squid compare to others?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Please can you explain why I am getting low hit rate in Squid proxy compare
to MS ISA 2000. Does it mean squid is not very much relieable compare to
this. I tuned my linux, when i discovered i got many errors anytime i go to
400/s or more, i changed to a tuned version of FreeBSD, this look very much
better but i got low hit rate though i configured my squid as it should.

hope to hear from you soon.

Regards.

Amisu

Next message: Alex Rousskov: "Re: why low hit rate in squid compare to others?"
Previous message: Alex Rousskov: "Re: need your help: unable to compile polygraph-2.7.6 on redhat 9.0"
In reply to: Alex Rousskov: "Re: need your help: unable to compile polygraph-2.7.6 on redhat 9.0"
Next in thread: Alex Rousskov: "Re: why low hit rate in squid compare to others?"
Reply: Alex Rousskov: "Re: why low hit rate in squid compare to others?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 06 2006 - 12:00:26 MST