> I was running polymix-1, with just one server and one
> robot. And, I
> noticed that the reply rate is a lot higher on the polyclt than on the
> polysrv side. Could this be a cause of the above problem?
I am sorry... I just realized that the difference in the rates is because
all the requests don't reach the server, instead are fulfilled by the cache,
which is the purpose.
-Sadhna.
> polysrv::
> 006.28| i-meas 8587 22.99 3048 0.00 0 65
> 006.36| i-meas 8687 20.00 3080 0.00 0 83
> 006.44| i-meas 8814 25.39 2992 0.00 0 68
> 006.53| i-meas 8927 22.60 3051 0.00 0 61
> 006.61| i-meas 9028 20.19 3049 0.00 0 80
> 006.69| i-meas 9162 26.78 3007 0.00 0 76
> 006.78| i-meas 9282 24.00 2875 0.00 0 83
> 006.86| i-meas 9405 24.60 3294 0.00 0 70
>
>
> polyclt::
> 006.20| i-meas 17589 54.20 17381 56.46 0 1038
> 006.28| i-meas 17825 47.18 22008 56.78 0 1065
> 006.37| i-meas 18085 51.99 21129 51.54 0 1069
> 006.45| i-meas 18326 48.20 15789 55.60 0 1054
> 006.53| i-meas 18581 50.99 17244 51.76 0 1055
> 006.62| i-meas 18837 51.19 19803 55.08 0 1094
> 006.70| i-meas 19101 52.80 20702 55.68 0 1075
> 006.78| i-meas 19355 50.78 13061 56.69 0 1095
>
> Thanks,
> Sadhna.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov@measurement-factory.com]
> > Sent: Friday,April 13,2001 8:19 PM
> > To: Lynn Scott
> > Cc: polygraph@ircache.net
> > Subject: Re: polyclt shutdown
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Duane Wessels wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Lynn Scott wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Sirs,
> > > >
> > > > I previous inquired of Alex on using the the --notify
> > option to signal
> > > > my process when Web Polygraph was complete. Alex
> > mentioned that if
> > > > properly configured, Polygraph processes quit when the
> > test is over. In
> > > > doing some testing, I am running polymix-1 on a single
> > workstation with
> > > > a very small duration expirement.
> > > >
> > > > // experiment duration
> > > > time ExpDur = 1min
> > > >
> > > > After the tests complete the server process (polysrv)
> > shutsdown properly
> > > >
> > > > 002.22| got 698 xactions and 0 errors
> > > > 002.22| shutdown reason: all 4 phases met their goals
> > > >
> > > > However, the client process continues to run.
> > > >
> > > > 002.35| i-cool 870 3.79 45001 100.00 18 28
> > > > 002.43| i-cool 870 0.20 -1 -1.00 1 27
> > > > 002.52| i-cool 870 3.19 -1 -1.00 16 11
> > > > 002.60| i-cool 870 2.00 -1 -1.00 10 1
> > > > 002.69| i-cool 870 0.00 -1 -1.00 0 1
> > > > 002.77| i-cool 870 0.00 -1 -1.00 0 1
> > > > 002.85| i-cool 870 0.20 -1 -1.00 1 0
> > > >
> > > > How do I properly configure so that both will shutdown?
> > >
> > > You might have to wait just a bit longer. I think the cool phase
> > > is hard-wired at one minute. Also the cool phase might not exit
> > > as long as there are outstanding requests (the last column).
> >
> > Not exactly. There are no hard-wired phases with non-zero minimum
> > duration in Polygraph. When all _configured_ phases are over and no
> > client-side idle timeout is specified, polyclt should exit.
> Polygraph
> > does have a dummy "cold" phase that starts right after all
> configured
> > phases are done, but that phase has no minimum duration and
> is usually
> > not even visible.
> >
> > My guess is that you are using Polygraph version 2.5.4 and
> you did not
> > specify idle timeout for the server side. Your servers quit
> > before clients. Recent polygraph versions synchronize phase
> schedules,
> > and when polysrv quits first, that synchronization breaks -- clients
> > wait for servers to confirm phase change for ever.
> >
> > The solution is to use "--idle_tout 3min" option (3min can
> be changed
> > to something smaller if needed) with polysrv and polysrv only. This
> > will be the default starting with the next release.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Alex.
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 12:00:18 MDT