Hi Jens,
We are writing a step-by-step manual for the bake-off tests.
Hopefully that manual will help you and other users. Meanwhile, if you are
comfortable with what 1.x version does, please note that result extraction
and even the console output has not changed much in 2.x (yet). Moreover,
the [reasonably well documented] console output contains all the most
important measurements: throughput, response time, hit ratio, and errors.
Alex.
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Jens-S. Voeckler wrote:
> It could also mean a third thing (I really shouldn't be saying this when
> looking at my own feeble attempts): The documentation for PolyGraph is
> needing a major push. True, the myriads of options are documented, and it
> is a fascinatingly tunable but complex system the poly team created.
> Still, I only have the faintest idea how things interact (for instance,
> how do I access results and where are they). There are just too many
> buttons and dials to fiddle with.
>
> Yes, the simple.pg test did work, but what did it tell me apart from
> "polygraph works"? I am desparately missing some kind of step by step
> guide through this "Labyrinth of Minotaurus", e.g. like the guidelines
> presented in the Utrecht workshop start of this year, or an upgrade of the
> Poly1 slides pages to Poly2.
>
> I am going to downgrade today to Poly1 in the hope of getting some
> *results*. Maybe some of the registered participants feel the same kind of
> frustration I got to know last week when trying to wrestle with Poly2.
>
> Le deagh dhùrachd,
> Dipl.-Ing. Jens-S. Vöckler (voeckler@rvs.uni-hannover.de)
> Institute for Computer Networks and Distributed Systems
> University of Hanover, Germany; +49 511 762 4726
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 12:00:09 MDT